Photographers:
Connections:

Copyright


 
LL/78652
 
Who owns a shadow? The battle to secure copyright for photography was not merely a legal struggle, but a philosophical fight to have the medium recognized as a legitimate art form. In the 19th century, critics argued that a machine could not create "art," and thus, photographs deserved no protection.
 
This theme traces the pivotal moments in intellectual property history—most notably the landmark Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony case of 1884—which established that the photographer’s posing, lighting, and selection constituted original authorship. Explore the evolution of ownership, from the earliest daguerreotypes to the digital watermarks of today, and understand how the protection of light and line has safeguarded the careers of the masters.

Membership Access Required

Trace the Authorship
 
Explore the history of ownership and the fight for artistic recognition.

Contents

Introduction
1Introduction to copyright and piracy
Copyright law in Great Britain - 1860 (Turner vs Robinson)
2The Death of Chatterton
Copyright law in USA - 1880s (Sarony vs. Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co)
3Copyright law in USA - 1884 (Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. vs. Sarony)
Copyright law in Great Britain - 1888 (Messrs. Braun and Co. vs. A.E. Whitehouse)
4International Copyright of Photographs - Messrs. Braun and Co. (17 August 1888)
5International Copyright of Photographs - Messrs. Braun and Co. (24 August 1888)
6International Copyright of Photographs - Judgement - Messrs. Braun and Co. (21 September 1888)

Terms and conditions • Copyright • Privacy • Contact me
Contributors retain copyright over their submissions
In using this website you agree to the Terms and Conditions
© Alan Griffiths - Luminous-Lint 2026